Infinite Quantum Zen

What Is Life? 2 of 3 What happens to the Earth affects everyone

~ ∞ ~ What Is Life? 2/3 – Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

So let us continue our discussion about life and slowly transition our focus towards “Life.” This is the point where we should ask ourselves the following questions: What do we really mean when we are talking about life? Where do we draw the line between living and non-living? And on what grounds do we say that something is alive and something is not? Furthermore, we should consider the following: If life isn’t what we think it is, maybe death isn’t what we imagine it to be, either?

In trying to define life, we have drawn a line at an arbitrary level of complexity and conveniently declared that everything above that imaginary border is alive and everything below it is not. In actuality, there’s no clear distinction anywhere on the Earth’s surface between living and non-living; there’s merely a hierarchy of intensity going from the ‘material’ environment of the rocks and the atmosphere to the living cells.

In other words, this division doesn’t exist outside the mind – there’s no threshold at which a collection of atoms suddenly becomes alive, no categorical distinction between the living and inanimate. It’s not that there’s no material difference between living things and the inanimate; rather, we will never find some clean dividing line between the two.

This is because the notion of life and non-life as distinct categories is just that – a notion, not actuality; and yet we are still very eager to judge whether something is dead or alive, living or non-living, animate or inanimate.

Even though dualistic thinking is under challenge, it is still influential, and thus we are very keen to dualism in our thinking when it comes to the subject of life. To give an example: there is no uniform consensus on whether viruses are a form of life or just some organic structures that interact with living organisms.

Viruses are essentially strands of DNA or RNA packaged inside a protein shell; they don’t have cells or a metabolism but they do have genes and they can evolve. Thus viruses have been described as “organisms at the edge of life,” since they resemble organisms in that they possess genes, evolve by natural selection, and reproduce by creating multiple copies of themselves through self-assembly.

So therefore, yet again, it is more than reasonable to ask ourselves: What Is Life, really? Could Life be something much more complex than we have used to? Could there be something “outside” the material structures that gives birth to life as we know it? Something that we’re not able to see through microscopes, e.g., morphic fields*1 that contain an inherent memory transmitted from similar past organisms by the process of morphic resonance*2.

_______
*1 Fields that play a causal role in morphogenesis. This term, first proposed in the 1920’s, is now widely used by developmental biologists. According to the morphosis of formative causation, these fields contain an inherent memory, transmitted from similar past organisms by the process of morphic resonance.

*2 The influence of previous structures of activity on subsequent similar structures of activity, organized by morphic fields. According to the hypothesis of formative causation, morphic resonance involves the transmission of formative influences through or cross time and space without a decrease due to distance or lapse of time.

Could these morphic fields explain why viruses seem to have intelligence of their own – shared intelligence that drives the extent of the mutations to ensure organisms survival? Keeping that in mind, quite curiously, a recent study has found that not only are viruses alive, they are also really, really old, and they share a long evolutionary history with cells.

They simply have an atypical mode of living that’s slightly different from ours – they are not fully independent; instead, they move in and out of our bodies – stealing the resources and producing their offspring. Having said that, it is quite obvious that we need to broaden the way in which we define life and its associated activities.

Although the discussion in this chapter is mostly about life in general, it would not be complete without briefly talking about human life in the context of evolution. You see, in the Western worldview, which has its roots in scientific materialism, it is strongly believed that humans*1 emerged in evolution through random genetic mutations as the result of a spontaneous reshuffling of molecules in the genes.

_______
*1 This area is explored in more detail in the chapters, 1.) Humanity – The Pinnacle of Evolution? 2.) The Preciousness of Human Life, 3.) When Does a Human Life Begin? 4.) Our Spiritual Nature.

More precisely, it is considered as a given fact; with a leap of faith, scientific materialism accepts this assumption as truth, giving us the impression that no truths lie beyond the domain of science.

As such, it is pretty clear that scientism (the claim that science is the only source of knowledge; that science is the absolute and only justifiable access to the truth) has taken a considerably larger foothold in the world today. As a result, science has become ever more so pathological in nature, and thus taken a drastic turn toward being a faith, carrying religious-like undertones in its current structure.

The problem here is that the scientifically oriented people most often tend to believe that the only way to understand the nature of the universe and life in it, is through deterministic facts and evidence, but the honest and harsh truth is that in science there are no facts – there are data and models, and all models are provisional and incomplete.

Despite this obvious truth, these models that are based on incomplete data are taken as facts and therefore as truth. Scientific materialism essentially reduces human existence to our physical existence, and so it goes that we are fooling ourselves to believe that we are merely these physical bodies and mind.

But when we account for sentience, intelligence, and qualia (subjective, conscious experience) – something that cannot be measured or quantified, it becomes a whole lot more complicated than that. If we are to better understand ourselves, we should consider that there may be some other factors in play, other than the biological ones – especially when it comes to us human beings.

Unfortunately, we seem to be fixated on this romanticized idea of biological evolution, as if it would somehow solve the problem of consciousness, and therefore our existence as intelligent sentient beings. As a result, human life has become a philosophical issue increasingly forgotten, obscured, or passed off as a mere subjective appearance.

This presents an interesting conundrum. You see, isn’t it the other way around – life in general being a subjective interpretation filtered through layers of perception to produce a limited perception of Reality? Let us flip the script for a moment, shall we? Now, if we are to suppose for a moment, that we humans are, indeed, the pinnacle of evolution – would it not then mean that consciousness is the end goal for evolution?

And now, if we can see evolution as a spiritual path, we must then see that consciousness is the most spiritual thing there is, and therefore we must be willing to surrender to the spiritual process – the process of fulfilling the telos of human existence if we are to evolve further, you see?

This romanticized idea of biological evolution serves the role of being “the” one, all-inclusive, “be-all-end-all” explanation for almost everything. What an excellent way to avoid the conundrum of the most profound – don’t you think? When a different kind of approach is presented – especially those dealing with spiritual matters, things get interesting to say the least.

In this kind of situation, one can experience almost eerie-like feeling, a disturbance in the force, a resistance of sorts. The possibility that life’s origin may be spiritual in nature scares the heck out of people, even the very mention of such a possibility or even the very idea itself makes people uncomfortable and uneasy. There is clearly something to it – at the grandest level.

However, somehow, somewhere along the way, as is the case with so many other things, the “survival of the fittest” became the new normal; forming the narrow perspective through which we perceive ourselves – molding the structures of society that are based on a competitive struggle for existence. All based on a belief – a matter of chance and necessity; life guided by the randomness of mutations channeled by the determinism of mechanism in the interplay between organism and environment.

It is this narrow lens which makes self and others seem wholly disconnected. Both as individuals and as a species, we suffer from a sense of self that feels disconnected not only from other people but from the Earth itself. This kind of view doesn’t leave any room for purpose in nature; all progress and evolution is believed to be merely the injection of novelty through mutations – selected according to the necessities of survival in a particular niche.

Against this backdrop, we can easily see that this kind of limited materialistic view has created many levels of distortion into our collective worldview, which is another way of saying that the more rigid and narrow our thinking becomes, the more we seem to miss and dismiss the big picture of it all.

And so it seems that modern philosophy and science tries to limit the knowledge of the world and ourselves by reducing reality to what can be detected through sensory experience or can be analyzed with reason – leaving no room for intuition, insight and Inner Knowing*1.

_______
*1 Inner Knowing is the ability to know what you need to know when you need to know it.

When we are perceiving the world around us through the narrow scope of vision, we are also limiting the definitions that constitutes something as being alive, and therefore we tend to draw a strict line between living and non-living. The latter is believed to be something that lacks or has stopped displaying the characteristics of ‘life.’

Therefore, solid inanimate objects like crystals and rocks are often considered as being non-living because of their seemingly solid nature. But in all actuality, they are very much alive – it’s just their energy vibration that’s condensed to such a low vibrating motion that we perceive them as solid objects.

This is to say that crystals e.g., take thousands of years to grow, and when we observe them a little closer, we can see that underlying within their dense and physical appearance, there is, indeed, energy filled with living, vibrating Life – a living sea of consciousness.

In a crystal we have clear evidence of the existence of a formative life principle, and though we cannot understand the life of a crystal, it is nonetheless a living being. ~ Nikola Tesla

This goes on to say that there’s something beyond the surface – something much more wonderful and mysterious that is neither being nor not-being, neither living nor not-living. This something is a state of pure awareness beyond the limitations of space, time, and form.

This core essence is found in everything within nature and the universe – including us human beings. But for some reason, it is difficult for us to recognize that we are something much more than the physical body we inhabit. And for that reason we use the words “Soul” or “Spirit” in our attempt to describe that which is within our body; that which gives us our personality; that essence which ultimately animates our body – our Life Force.

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: What Is Life? 3/3 – The Essence of Life: Part I ]

What Is Life? 1 of 3 All Life Exists in an Interconnected Web

~ ∞ ~ What Is Life? 1/3 – Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

Now that we have reached a level of understanding that is more than adequate enough to carry us through some of the more complex topics, we can delve deeper into the subject of life, and more specifically – human life.

Naturally, in this section, we explore the deep and fundamental questions about life and death, existence and non-existence, examine the meaning of life, and also touch upon the human condition that is inherent and innate to all human beings. In the following chapters, we will take a deep dive into humans as we know humans, in the context of life and existence.

Each of these chapters build upon each other, gradually adding new layers of depth and complexity, which in turn gives room for more context to emerge, slowly painting a bigger picture. In a way, this bigger picture is a story of humans as we know humans – their challenges, weaknesses and shortcomings, but also their strengths and opportunities.

In this regard, this section – as a whole, can be said to be an unapologetic exploration of the human species – the only intelligent, sentient bipedal species known to exist in this universe that seeks to find answers to the deeper questions concerning existence and life itself.

As a way of introduction, let us consider the following: When we ask the question, “What is life?” most people seek to answer this question from the world of phenomena, and thus they fail to address the deeper level of the question: What is it that makes you – you? What is it that makes up the whole of who you are?

Obviously, there is no all-encompassing answer, which makes it all the more intriguing, doesn’t it? We can begin answering these questions by shedding some light on how we currently see and define life, and then expand upon it by exploring various aspects of the same.

Perhaps it is best to start the discussion about this topic with the following thought: throughout the history of humanity, thinkers in many fields have tried to define life – failing to provide a universally accepted definition. For as long as we have studied life, we have struggled to define it, and even today scientists have no satisfactory or universally accepted definition of life.

No one has been able to explain what causes something to be alive, and what distinguishes animate from inanimate matter. There hasn’t been much success on this front in philosophy or medicine either. In other words, there is no closure – there are models, and there are questions.

Furthermore, as of 2022, there’s no single, generally accepted model for the Origin of Life either – only several theories or hypothesis exist which are all based on the molecular or chemical evolution of life. In other words, no one knows how did life start, or what is the process that makes “normal matter” living matter.

We seem to be focusing solely on the biological aspect of life – so much so that we have forgotten to consider that there may be some other factors in play – especially when it comes to us human beings. As such, biologists study what life does, not what life is. Having said that, let me ask you this: Why does it appear that we are fixated on this one single aspect of life, completely disregarding other possibilities? Well, let us find out, shall we?

At this point, we should introduce a term that’s important to keep in mind as we explore the subject of life. Not only because it helps us see how limited our thinking is, but also because it can show us important aspects that we have overlooked. The term is “scientific materialism,” which goes hand in hand with another term called “positivism.”

The former is a view according to which all phenomena in the universe, including the human mind, have a material basis, are subject to the same physical laws, and can be most deeply understood by scientific analysis. The latter is a philosophical system recognizing only that which can be scientifically verified, or which is capable of logical or mathematical proof, and therefore rejecting metaphysics and theism.

This leads us to conclude that scientific research into the nature of life often focuses on the material, energetic and temporal limitations within which life can exist. The problem is, though, that no matter how advanced our level of science and technology is, no matter how sophisticated our equipment, or how complex our methods of analysis have become, we still don’t have a clue what life is – this is why we have so many theories, you see?

These theories are quite fantastic to say the least because they postulate that life arises from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds, and yet, Earth remains the only place in the universe known to harbour life as we know it. And so you see, it stands to reason, then, that life – and more specifically, intelligent life – is incredibly rare.

Considering that the odds against the existence of life on Earth are on the order of 10^10^123 – as mentioned earlier in this book, it seems plausible, though not entirely impossible, yet probable, and very much possible, that intelligent life in the universe is so incredibly rare that it only happened once.

If that is indeed the case, then what does it say about life, especially human life? That we are special beyond imagination? And when these two unfathomably rare, if not mystical occurrences – the creation of our fine-tuned universe and intelligent life in it, happened to even happen at all, makes you wonder is there a plan, a purpose or a reason to our existence?

What is clear is that the universe we find ourselves in, has, indeed, a purpose – to facilitate intelligent life, which makes it a purposeful universe, does it not? If one really stops to contemplate this magnificent feat – the fine-tuned universe and everything in it – galaxies, stars, planets, and all other forms of matter and energy; the existence of the human body, a biological marvel, one of a kind – it becomes undeniable that everything points to an Intelligently Designed Universe – intriguing, isn’t it? What is even more intriguing is that every attempt to prove otherwise points directly to this truth.

Having said that, let me ask you this: Isn’t it fascinating that despite all of our knowledge and advances in so many fields, still no one can say for certain what ignited that original spark*1 that started life for plants, animals, fish, birds, and people? Indeed, there’s a certain irony in knowing that the one significant event in cosmic history that organic evolution by means of natural selection cannot explain is the Origin of Life itself; and so the question remains: Is there some greater purpose to it all, or no purpose at all?

_______
*1 The “Big Bang” is a name given to a theory that has become the prevailing cosmological model for the observable universe. According to this theory, there was a primordial explosion, an enormous bang billions of years ago which brought our universe into existence.

Furthermore, considering the fact that what we know is infinitesimal compared to what we don’t know, it is reasonable to ask ourselves: Is there any other lens through which we can look at life? And could it be possible that life may actually be something much more than we know; something quite different from what we have thought it to be – a way more complex wholeness, yet simple enough to be understood if looked at from different angles and points of view – in particular through the terms of energy, frequency, vibration, consciousness, and awareness.

This brings us to the wonderful world of the Quantum*1 – it opens up a totally new level to our understanding of the world, which in turn brings a deeper understanding of life itself and its relation to the aforementioned energy, frequency, vibration, consciousness, and awareness.

_______
*1 This area is explored in more detail in the section titled QUANTUM.

You see, instead of a lonely void with isolated particles moving through it, space appears to be filled with connections and interconnected fields; these quantum fields are energy, manifesting into form when they intersect – this is why ideas, concepts and metaphors transform into a web of information and weaving, or to the world of dreams and infinite possibility. Let us explore this further and see where it takes us, shall we?

In the 20th century, a new science – Quantum Mechanics*1, the science of the very small, was discovered that didn’t obey any of the familiar classical rules. Most scientists believed that this new science was only relevant to the tiny particles of which atoms and molecules are composed.

_______
*1 Quantum Mechanics, the science of the very small, describes how fundamental particles can be in one or several places at once, can pass through impenetrable barriers or possess instantaneous connections that are maintained over vast distances.

But as the attention of 21st century biology turned to probing the dynamics of ever-smaller biological systems, something unusual began to emerge. This something is often coined as “quantum weirdness,” because particles can be in one or several places at once; can pass through impenetrable barriers; or possess instantaneous connections that are maintained over vast distances.

Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founders of Quantum Mechanics, proposed in his 1944 book What Is Life? that some of life must be ruled by quantum rather than classical rules. As expected, most biologists pretty much ignored Schrödinger’s proposal and continued to treat life as a complex chemical machine made of molecules; and so it seems that we as the collective human species are stuck in old, outdated & outmoded beliefs dating back to the nineteenth century, the time when scientists arrived at the conclusion that life was just an extraordinarily complex chemical reaction based on the principles of classical chemistry and physics.

Because we are so insistent on the assumption that life is nothing more than self-organizing chemistry – we fail to see the obvious. As a result, in today’s world, the prevailing belief is that we live in an unliving universe – meaning that all the models for the Origin of Life are pathological*1 in nature. As a result, the power of our belief affects the consensus reality*2 that we perceive and experience.

_______
*1 Pathological comes from a Greek word, pathologikos, which means “treating of diseases” – pathos means “suffering.”
*2 Consensus reality refers to an agreed-upon concepts of reality which people in the world, or a culture or group believe are real (or treat as real), usually based upon their common experiences as they believe them to be. This means that our collective perception of reality is programmed to validate the beliefs we hold. In other words, consensus reality is a self-fulfilling prophecy, a limitation, a box – it defines our expectations, and because we only perceive what we expect to perceive, it limits us.

In a nutshell, the core belief is this: in the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing, and then this nothing magically exploded for no apparent reason creating everything, and then a bunch of everything mysteriously rearranged itself for no reason whatsoever – into self-replicating bits which then turned into living beings – makes perfect sense, does it not?

This kind of underlying belief reinforces another, much more harmful one: the belief that humans are nothing special in the context of the Cosmos – as if the Earth and its inhabitants were just a big “cosmic accident” of some sort; that humans were thrown randomly into this world, born by chance into a random environment – death being the end of everything.

Now, let us flip the script for a moment, shall we? If we really think about it, wouldn’t this then suggest that everything that exists is indeed a result of a miracle? Does it not, indeed, require a miracle to have living beings come out of non-living matter? There’s a certain irony in that every attempt to prove otherwise points directly to this truth. You see, if we were to calculate the probability of life existing at all, it would be so infinitesimal that the “accidental” or “coincidental” creation of our universe is an impossibility.

The improbable odds of life existing in the cosmos surely suggests that we are not the result of random chance, does it not? And yet, in spite of this, all too many continue to deny the obvious. Interestingly, there are but two ways of seeing life – like nothing is a miracle, or as if everything is a miracle – the choice is, obviously, yours, and yours only to make.

And here we cannot but arrive at the conclusion: those who are of the opinion that the creation of our universe, the Earth and its inhabitants is the result of a big “cosmic accident” of some sort, are clearly of the former bunch, are they not?

And now you may be wondering: How can something come out of nothing? Well, it can’t – not without a miracle, you see? The first step in understanding creation out of nothing or just simply ‘ex nihilo,’ is to learn to appreciate and understand paradox – accommodating different viewpoints within a broader perspective; seeing the opposites as complementary which are equally important parts of the whole.

You see, the wisdom lies in paradox: even if something contradicts itself, it can still be true; some would call this ‘coincidentia oppositorum,’ or just simply Unity of Opposites. A thing is both what it is and what it is not, and yet it somehow escapes contradiction – that’s how the Miracle of Life is possible – see?

This, of course, is the obvious part we have failed to see, or better yet, we have willingly disregarded it altogether – choosing ignorance over truth, blindness over sight, and in the end – darkness over light; after all, it makes many people uneasy, particularly because it would mean that there is a Creator – Truth we cannot handle, it seems.

It is simply astonishing how deep we have fallen into ignorance. This is fascinating to say the least because in so incredibly brief and short period of time our whole worldview has taken a drastic turn for the worse. This is to say that for most of human history the answer always was that Life was special; it was animated by some kind of Spirit, Soul, or just simply Life Force*1 – a Vital Spark that was absent from the non-living.

_______
*1 Life Force has many different names in different parts of the world. In China it is called Qi, in Hawaii it is called Mana, in India it is called Prana, in Christianity in the Western world it is called the Holy Spirit.

In the Western world, this view is called vitalism – it has a long history in medical philosophies: most traditional healing practices posited that disease results from some imbalance in vital forces. But somehow, by the end of the 19th century, vitalism was pretty much discredited by the discovery that living organisms are made from the same chemicals as the inanimate world – atoms and molecules of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and so on. Yet, no secret or magical ingredient was ever found.

From this, the question arises: Are we really to believe that living beings can come out of non-living matter? Are we really to believe that life can spontaneously come out of something that is not alive, without any reason, without any purpose, without the First Cause?*1 When we stop to think about this, it becomes clear that even the basic common sense says that Life can only come out of Life, and only Life can sustain Life.

_______
*1 First cause, in philosophy, the self-created being (i.e., God) to which every chain of causes must ultimately go back.

The undeniable truth is that although various aspects of life can be manipulated in many ways, we cannot create Life or consciousness where it doesn’t already exist. In other words, it’s not possible for us to create Life in a lab – just for the simple fact that we cannot create Life Force; we cannot create a new Soul; we cannot create consciousness nor its underlying awareness.

And with this, we arrive at an astonishing conclusion: if we cannot create Life in a lab from scratch, with the same building blocks that Life uses to create multitudes of life forms we find on Earth, would it not then mean that the core essence of our being is not found in matter?

This leads us to a staggering conclusion: the gift of Life is passed on – this is why we have babies, to continue as a species – see? Against this backdrop, it is reasonable to ask ourselves: What is Life, really? It is worth noting that here we use the word “Life” – emphasis on the capital letter; more on this later.

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: What Is Life? 2/3 – The Essence of Life: Part I ]

Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 3 of 3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within

~ ∞ ~ Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 3/3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

Like mentioned earlier, we are blinded by our hubris and denial of things obvious, so much so that we often think that we have discovered some of the great truths of life; some even believe that they have cracked the mystery of life through some sort of equation or formula. But alas, the honest truth is that science alone cannot solve the ultimate mystery of life, simply because we ourselves are an intrinsic part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.

Therefore, it is obvious that we need to better understand ourselves to understand the universe, nature, and life itself, you see? We need to better understand how we relate to the world and to one another – how we are in the world, how we relate to where we are, and how we act towards other people. Other such explorations would include such considerations as why we are the way we are, and what it all means for who we as individuals and as a species want to become.

By virtue of the aforementioned, it is paramount to highlight the following truth: it is evident that in the coming decades science is poised to explore the mystery of consciousness – a new and ancient world of Souls and Eternal Spirit – the Inner Universe of the Mind (Innerverse).

And so you see, just as we are now discovering that consciousness is distributed through every cell of the body, soon we may discover that it is distributed in every photon or particle of light throughout the universe and beyond. The realization is indeed dawning on us that the universe may actually be conscious in every part of itself. This new understanding may help to modify the deeply entrenched belief that spirit and nature are separate and distinct.

Against this backdrop, we can see that science and philosophy would need to ask different kinds of questions and explore other ways of knowing beyond the limits of reason and the limited spectrum of the senses, which goes on to say that there are other ways of knowing – such as feeling, intuition and direct knowing – direct experience of non-sensory realities; these types of knowing are equally valid and need to be encouraged, honored and developed, would you agree?

It follows, then, that if we cultivate these types of knowing, we can begin to see Existential Intelligence become more prominent in the population, you see? Existential Intelligence can be seen as the ability to be sensitive to, or have the capacity for, conceptualizing or tackling deeper or larger questions about human existence – the proclivity to pose and ponder questions about life, death, and ultimate realities.

This type of intelligence is needed and welcomed as we move toward a new era of awareness. As such, it can be said that it is an essential prerequisite to possess this kind of intelligence in a larger population for us to make a population-wide shift in paradigm. And so you see, if this were to happen, it in itself would be, precisely, the said metaphysical paradigm shift.

This kind of metaphysical paradigm shift may eventually restore our lost sense of connection with the Sacred Earth and a Conscious Universe. This is because, on a deeper level, Existential Intelligence includes the capacity to transcend the physical and material aspects of life, and hence the ability to experience heightened states of consciousness, by which the ability of utilizing spiritual resources to solve problems comes to fruition.

As indicated earlier in this section, it requires new ways of going about things to take us from mechanical to natural, from machines to ecosystems, from straight lines to curves, from hierarchies to networks; to see not just the parts but to see the whole, not just analyze but to synthesize. This change of paradigms means not only shifting our thinking from the parts to the whole, but also from structure to process.

In this new paradigm, we consciously recognize and acknowledge that we are an inseparable part of a Living Universe, which means that we are aware that process is primary and every structure we observe is a manifestation of an underlying process, which makes them living structures – and these together form a living system – see?

Ultimately, the understanding of living structures is inextricably linked to understanding renewal, change and transformation. Therefore, the shift of perspective from the parts to the whole can also be seen as a shift from objects to relationships.

Let us go deeper. A simple observation shows that all living systems are non-linear in nature – their basic pattern of organization are networks; all non-linear networks have emerging and flexible structures. At each level, the living system is an integrated whole with smaller components, while at the same time being a part of a larger whole.

Living systems are integrated wholes whose properties cannot be reduced to those of smaller parts. Their essential or “systemic” properties are properties of the whole which none of the parts have – they arise from patterns of organization that are characteristic of a particular class of systems. Ultimately, as Quantum Physics has shown – there are no parts at all, for you see, what we call a part is merely a pattern in an inseparable web of relationships.

Throughout the living world, we find living systems nesting within other living systems, which means that nature has learned how to create organisms that grow and self-organize without planning – still working in unison. To give an example: cells combine to form tissues, tissues to form organs, and organs to form organisms.

Material world, therefore – ultimately, is a network of inseparable patterns of relationships. This means that also the Earth as a whole is an Intelligent Living System. In other words, an autopoietic system – self-producing, self-perpetuating, self-organizing, self-maintaining and self-regulating intelligent system.

Understanding the pattern of self-organization is the key to understanding the essential nature of life. So therefore, to understand these types of non-linear living systems, we need to use a new kind of thinking. Instead of limited, linear, serial processing – we should be using unlimited, non-linear, parallel mental processing.

This upgraded version of operating includes a new way of thinking that would be more in the lines of a direct acknowledgement and instant knowing – the type that is demonstrated to a large degree in this book. If we shift our perception from linear to non-linear, we can see possibilities emerge that were once invisible.

In this way, we are changing our behaviors and attitudes from self-assertive to integrative, from rational to intuitive, from reductionist to holistic, and from separation to connectedness. For the sake of analogy, rather than seeing water as merely a physical element necessary for life, we should acknowledge it as a transformational agent that can lead us into new fresh ways of innovative thinking and action – see?

Let us end this chapter and section with the following words. Non-linear way of operating is based on the universal behavioral patterns of non-linear living networks – it provides a hopeful, creative, peaceful, and ecologically harmonic framework to experience the world around and within us. Non-linear way of operating demonstrates Unconditional Love (Agape – Universal Love, Loving-Kindness and Compassion) as its ethical value and guiding principle, which is the core of Spiritual Intelligence.

This new way of looking at the world has its roots on the wisdom of the ancients, on the already established “Systems Thinking,” and “Systems Intelligence,” but also on the emerging new type of intelligence that we don’t currently have words for – resembling the aforementioned Existential Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence; it involves thinking not only in terms of process, relationships, patterns, and context, but also in terms of energy, frequency, vibration, consciousness, and awareness.

This new way of thinking and seeing the world and ourselves can be seen as a form of intelligence that celebrates the Miracle of Life in many different ways on many different levels. Although not always immediately obvious, this new type of intelligence is a big part of the discussion throughout this book.

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: What Is Life? 1/3 – The Essence of Life: Part I ]

Extra Material: Video: You're It - Alan Watts. Video description: "An inspiring and profound speech from the late Alan Watts. Speech extract from 'Zen Bones and Tales' by Alan Watts"

Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 2 of 3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within

~ ∞ ~ Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 2/3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

Now, if one takes a moment to consider everything we have already discussed in this book, it becomes evident that our inability to see “beyond the box” has had a significant impact on our ingenuity, which in turn has prevented us – if not solely, at least largely, from utilizing everything we have already discovered in the world of science in creative, innovative and beneficial ways.

We have made major strides, yes, but we still have a long way to go; to get to a place where we can live in harmony with each other and the Earth; to get to a place where we can live happily and comfortably with less, but with more of what we truly need and less of what we don’t. You see, living more is found in loving more, giving more, and sharing more. As things stand, in regard to the current paradigm, here is where we make our biggest mistake.

You see, humans as we know humans, usually do the right thing, but for the wrong reasons – more often than not, we are motivated by personal gain rather than the common good. Is it not, then, right here, where we need a shift in perspective, a different lens through which to consider what is good and wholesome, what is constructive and what is not, what is beneficial and what is harmful, what is sustainable and what is unsustainable?

Unfortunately, as things stand, we as human beings seem to be driven by power, profit and financial gain more than anything else, which goes on to say that people tend to value personal gain and success above the common good and the well-being of others. In a broader sense, this means that we’re not willing to openly share truthful and relevant information without a price tag.

Regardless of the field, information and findings, experimental designs and solutions that could be of immense benefit to everyone, foremost of which are, obviously, anything health related – are tightly kept secrets. These types of secrets often exist in layers, with some secrets buried under other secrets. All because of monetary and political interests that benefit the few at the expense of the many.

The relationship between politics and corporate interests has been well established, and thus it can be said to be common knowledge – nothing new in that; it is the shady morals, weak or non-existent code of ethics, and questionable strategies with opaque disclosures that do most harm. Apart from the political arena, most prominently we see this play out in the world of science and research. Secrecy, half-truths, and corporate interests are the things that keeps them moving – that is not to say progressing – two completely different things, you see?

And so it goes that, as things stand, scientific knowledge that shapes our perceptions and understandings of the world is influenced by political competition and pressure, which in turn is influenced by privileged cohorts with money and power. This is particularly harmful because not only does scientific knowledge shape our view of the world, but also our beliefs and prejudices, values and attitudes, actions and behaviors, and ultimately – our consensus reality – see?

The relationship between science and politics has been well established, with the politicization of science becoming increasingly apparent in recent years, having extended into nearly every scientific field, including biology, physics, medicine, and the social sciences.

With the current paradigm, not only do we blur the information and skew the results, but we also bury the truthful and relevant information with misinformation and disinformation; and on top of that, we also silence those who dare to speak the truth or challenge the status-quo, regardless of the field, you see?

Awful lot of resources are spent and much effort put into criticising and discrediting such people and their work. To someone who is observant and has a keen eye for detail, it may be impossible to notice that there seems to be an ongoing invisible war of narratives, of ideas, of knowledge – or the lack thereof. The battleground is our minds and hearts – see? What it comes down to is consciousness, and moreover – awareness, or the lack thereof.

Despite tremendous advances in so many fields, we still have great suffering in the world, and thus humanity continues to face enormous difficulties and problems. Many of these problems are directly linked to, and partly, if not solely, caused by the aforementioned status-quo, but there is another aspect to it, too.

Considering that personal suffering stems mainly from craving and ignorance – the same naturally applies to the suffering that afflicts us on a collective scale. We humans are beings who are particularly good at ignoring problems and their causes; we are beings who like to blame others and not take responsibility for our actions.

And since humans are not isolated beings, their interpersonal actions have much greater consequences and impact than most realize. Is it not true, then, that our tendency to be irresponsible inflicts suffering upon others? To inflict suffering upon others is to become more deeply involved in ignorance, deepening the problems we already have – see?

We as the collective human species – as humanity, have many shortcomings which are becoming more and more pronounced as the century progresses. However, we can overcome these shortcomings and the difficulties they bring with them – if we truly so desire, you see? Not only do we lack the will to do what is fair and just, but we hide behind our ignorance and wrap ourselves in a self-righteousness, and so it goes that regardless of the field, we prefer to acknowledge, credit, and support those who do the same – those who keep up a facade.

And so you see, those who we deem as leaders, teachers, specialists, and community leaders, are not always ethical, looking out for our best interest, or the real deal – no matter how much they claim to be. Blinded by groupthink, masses are doing the same – supporting, cheering, embracing and glorifying people who keep up a facade. In so doing, people give their acceptance and consent for this vicious cycle to continue.

As a result, wealth and power is concentrating at the top, into evermore fewer hands, increasing the gap between the haves and have nots, resulting in growing inequality and deepening poverty. And so you see, through ignorance, people are co-creating this privileged cohort – a small club of powerful and influential people who run the world through a complex web of lies and deceit. It’s a small club, and most of us are not in it – even those who think they are, probably aren’t – see?

By virtue of the aforementioned with regard to paradigm shift, it is paramount to highlight the following truth: we are so driven by greed, power and profit that even scientific ethics are largely guided by the commercial interests of corporate industry. The politicization of science has reached a point where even scientists do not examine their own motives very closely. The code of ethics of those scientists who are driving the scientific progress seems to be tied to our current paradigm through which we perceive ourselves as separate from everything else.

This obviously leaves the question lingering whether there is any code of ethics at all these days, you see? Does it not, then, require a fundamental shift of paradigms – a metaphysical one, if we are to go beyond the limits of our current paradigm, to overcome our shortcomings and the difficulties they bring with them? This brings us to openness and transparency, which are the pillars of truth, trust, and progress – pivotal in many ways, yet too often forgotten or ignored, undervalued and overlooked.

Here we should ask ourselves: What good would science do if theories and ideas, findings, concepts and experimental designs would not be shared openly with the public? Are we currently doing so, or is it all for show – a facade? And so you see, to advance further, there would have to be a true shift in values – the pillars of truth, trust, and progress: openness and transparency are a good place to start.

And so you see, we would need to incorporate the art of giving and sharing into the world of science, research and technology in such a way that it truly and equally benefits all of humanity rather than just the privileged few. For that to happen, we need a shift of perspective, so that we can see, recognize, and acknowledge that the good of others is also the good of oneself.

Another way of saying the same is through negation: the suffering of the world is our own suffering as well – see? If this were to happen – a shift toward genuine openness and transparency, it in itself, would be a paradigm shift, would it not? Here we can but imagine what the world would be like, if we all – as the collective humanity, would strive for happiness and pursue the Ultimate Truth.

Now, let us explore this further. In this kind of metaphysical paradigm shift, we move from the state of separation and isolation to the experience of unity, from selfishness to altruism, from fear to trust, from competition to cooperation, and transition from hate to love, gratitude and forgiveness. It is this inner movement that will introduce us to a new era of awareness.

If we are to make this leap into a new era of awareness, we need to be willing to explore new horizons, boldly push the boundaries beyond the accepted norms and conventions, leaving no rock unturned when seeking better ways of doing things; we need to be willing to collaborate with each other like never before, so that we can find better ways and solutions to mitigate and overcome future challenges. When we work together on a common goal, we can achieve things beyond our greatest imagination.

Unfortunately, our current paradigm through which we perceive ourselves as separate from everything else, has led to a situation where instead of truth, openness and transparency – secrecy, hubris and ignorance are the guiding principles of today’s corporations and institutions; it is in these places where most of the scientific research and experiments are done. There are exceptions, of course; however, this seems to be a growing trend, you see?

In this type of climate, with shady morals, weak or non-existent code of ethics, and questionable strategies with opaque disclosures, scientific experiments are running rampant. By the political, financial, and juridical means and mechanisms these entities seem to get away with almost anything. The aforementioned political, financial, and juridical entities in and of themselves are another can of worms entirely, and is left out of the discussion for the sake of simplicity.

With regard to scientific experiments: shrouded with secrecy, we are fed half-truths all the time, and quite conveniently these half-truths are presented as facts and then marketed to us as “discoveries.” No one knows the true extent of the costs, problems, and other issues involved in these experiments.

One of our main shortcomings as humans is hubris – it may even be the greatest of them all. You see, in our hubris, we often think that we have discovered some of the great truths of life, and thus we are trying our best to perfect everything through science and technology. Both of them are works in progress – science being a construction that emerges at a very specific juncture in the history of humanity, and technology its practical application.

While all this may come with good intentions – perfecting everything, it is precisely those good intentions that often lead us astray, which is another way of saying that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions,” as they say. In other words, good intentions, when acted upon, may have long-lasting, unintended consequences. You see, the honest truth is that we cannot perfect nature – everything is already perfect; it is our perception that needs adjustment, not the external aspects of life – see?

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 3/3 ]

Extra Material: Video: You're It - Alan Watts. Video description: "An inspiring and profound speech from the late Alan Watts. Speech extract from 'Zen Bones and Tales' by Alan Watts"

Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 1 of 3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within

~ ∞ ~ Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 1/3 - Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

The purpose of this chapter is to crystallize some of the more important themes which are woven through previous chapters. As such, it serves as a perfect segue to the next section where these aspects are magnified and explored further. Metaphysical paradigm shift, as it is referred to here, is an ensemble term used to describe everything that prevents us from seeing “beyond the box” and needs an “upgrade,” so to speak.

It includes everything that is considered having an impact in our lives, such as prevailing ideas, concepts, theories, narratives, assumptions, beliefs, perspectives, and values; it also includes worldviews, philosophies, theologies, ideologies, and even consensus reality – which, in and of itself, is the product of all the aforementioned – see?

We begin this chapter by defining metaphysics and paradigm shift, which will lay the foundation for more in-depth discussion of specific aspects of metaphysics in the context of paradigm shift. Metaphysics, according to its most common modern definition, has to do with a transcendent realm “beyond” what is perceptible to the senses; the term is related to “mysticism,” which is based on the word “mystery,” implying something hidden.

A paradigm is the collection of ideas and assumptions that pass from one generation to the next and which seem to be immutable. The paradigm shift, then, is when the paradigm shifts. In this process, everything that no longer serves its purpose – begins to fade away, to be replaced with something else; and with it goes all the old, outdated and outmoded structures that are limiting us – both as individuals and as a species.

This in turn gives way to a new understanding, a new way of seeing, a new way of living and being, doing and acting. And so you see, paradigm shifts are necessary for growth and transformation, are they not?

Given the current situation we find ourselves in, witnessing the deteriorating conditions of the Earth, growing instability of the social, political, and economic world structures, one can easily conclude that it has never been a better time to experience a shift in perspective, to experience a shift of paradigms and strive ahead with new ideas and approaches. You see, we are an inseparable part of a Living Universe, and therefore we can no longer leave ourselves out of the equation.

As such, we should grow in our understanding beyond what is currently known and strive to improve ourselves in every way possible; we should strive to be united as a species; focus our attention and energy for the betterment of humanity as a whole; use our intelligence and ingenuity to further improve the quality of human life, to grow and develop our skills and talents. And so you see, it is necessary for our evolvement that we go through a metaphysical paradigm shift, is it not?

The shift of paradigms requires not only the expansion of our perceptions and the ways of thinking, but also of our values – from consumption to conservation, from competition to cooperation, from quantity to quality, and from domination to partnership. Hence, it goes without saying that we should mature and grow spiritually – it is an essential part of transformation, progress and growth.

In this context, it may be immensely helpful to “flip the script” for a moment and consider a different kind of approach than what we are accustomed to. If we can see evolution as a spiritual path, we must then see that consciousness is the most spiritual thing there is, and therefore we must be willing to surrender to the spiritual process – the process of fulfilling the telos of human existence, if we are to evolve further, you see?

To achieve this, we need a new paradigm – one that will help us adjust our lifestyle in a way that would allow us to bring health, harmony and balance back into our everyday life. To achieve such a state of dynamic balance – a radically different social and economic structure is needed, as well.

The creation of a new paradigm includes:

– a new understanding of God or Spirit.
– a new understanding of reality.
– a new understanding of nature.
– a new understanding of ourselves.

In this transition, we move:

– from a view of the universe as dead and mechanical to alive and dynamic.
– from separate parts to interconnected wholes.
– from objective to subjective.
– from control, prediction, and certainty to influence, probability, and uncertainty.
– from unaware to mindful.
– from events and outcomes to process and patterns.
– from either/or to both/and.

Now that we have covered the basics, we can take a closer look at the details. What essentially defines this shift of paradigms is the following: what was once considered “outside the box” thinking or thinking “without” the box becomes the new normal. It is through this change in perspective that we stride by leaps and bounds into the future.

Metaphysical paradigm shift has largely to do with the notion of a Living Universe, which is consistent with the now widely accepted Gaia theory, which wonderfully demonstrates that the Earth itself is a Living System. All life exists in an interconnected web, which means that what happens to the Earth affects everyone, and everyone’s behavior affects the Earth – together they form a symbiotic relationship, you see?

Therefore, it is essential to be aware of, and to appreciate the Interconnected Web of All Life. Human beings are an intrinsic part of this Interconnected Web of Life, and since humans are not isolated beings, we need to know how we work as a sub-system within the whole. When we relate to other human beings, to the living nature around us, to human organizations, and to the economy – we are always dealing with living systems.

Thus, we as human beings are always part of different systems, and we can act intelligently from within those systems, e.g., every day humans live immersed in social systems – dynamic groups of interconnected people functioning together as a whole.

Whether we are able to act intelligently within these systems – is up to our level of awareness, and thus if we want to have a complete picture, we need to know the basics of what constitutes a human being. And so you see, in order to have a complete picture, we need to start from the beginning and ask ourselves: What is consciousness, and further: What is awareness?

Now, let us remind ourselves of one important truth: Life is simpler than we think, and yet, at the same time, it is more complex than we can imagine. This goes on to say that simplicity makes sense in a Living Universe. Indeed, simplicity is the true form of perfection, and therefore it is only natural that simplicity is at the core of every Living System. It is unfortunate that we fail to recognize this single most important truth.

Therefore, it is not unsurprising that we can see the results in our everyday lives. You see, the current mechanistic worldview permeates through every facet of our lives, making it difficult to see “beyond the box.” But if we shift our thinking in such a way that we begin to think in terms of energy, frequency, vibration, consciousness, and awareness – a whole new world begins to open up for us.

This metaphysical paradigm shift will make it clear that consciousness is the next great frontier, for science, for philosophy, for our personal and collective well-being. That is to say, without knowing the Innerverse, we would know nothing at all, and everything we think we know – would have no deeper meaning. Therefore, we should ask ourselves: How could we possibly know anything at all, if we don’t know the Innerverse – consciousness and awareness?

It goes without saying that asking the same kinds of questions and doing the same kinds of things over and over while expecting different results is the epitome of foolishness, isn’t it? Against this backdrop, we can see that we would need to ask different kinds of questions to get new kinds of answers; we would need to explore different kinds of approaches and perspectives to see beyond what seems possible; we would need to push the boundaries beyond the accepted norms and conventions.

Now, let me ask you this: Wouldn’t it be great if we would strive to liberate our minds from what we are familiar with, so that we could reach toward something new and exciting, striving to push the boundaries of what is possible, gradually venturing into the unknown – to discover what lies beyond the limits of the known?

When you really think about it, doesn’t it seem as though this unexplored world of consciousness – Innerverse, is both the great mystery we are afraid to explore, and dogma that we are too afraid and reluctant to burst open? It certainly would help if the bubble of scientific dogma would burst open first and scientism that blinds us from seeing beyond self-imposed limits and illusion would be dismantled altogether, wouldn’t it?

Apart from the aforementioned, it would help tremendously if the politicization of science would be dismantled altogether as well. You see, the relationship between science and politics has been well established, becoming increasingly apparent in recent years, having extended into nearly every scientific field. It follows, then, that these influences in combination with ignorance and hubris are having a major impact on our lives in so many different ways on so many different levels.

Our view of the world profoundly impacts how we live and interact with the world and with each other – it is essential, then, that the scientific knowledge that shapes and limits the contours of our social reality should be expanded to include non-measurable phenomena – such as values, meaning, purposes, and feelings – in other words, subjective inner experiences of the individuals, or short – consciousness and awareness – see?

That said, it should be noted that science is a wonderful tool for showing us the ways of interpreting the physical world; as a tool and system of inquiry, science excels in this role of exploring the physical reality exceptionally well. However, scientific paradigms can become a form of dogma, resisting the scientific revolutions of thinking and discovery that always, eventually, make these old paradigms obsolete.

This goes on to say that we cannot solve old paradigm problems by dealing in old paradigm solutions – this is especially true with everything consciousness related, and hence metaphysical paradigm shift is more than welcomed. Someday soon, once we reach a new way of thinking that will liberate our minds not only from dogma and bias, but also from ignorance and hubris, can we approach this from another perspective, and truly proclaim to do proper science – see? Because of these reasons, it is necessary to unravel some of the layers in the following few paragraphs.

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 2/3 ]

Extra Material: Video: You're It - Alan Watts. Video description: "An inspiring and profound speech from the late Alan Watts. Speech extract from 'Zen Bones and Tales' by Alan Watts"

~ ∞ ~ The Living Earth (Gaia) - Awaken the Living Awareness Within ~ ∞ ~

As an extension of the previous chapter, concerning the ancient wisdom and its resurgence, it goes without saying that in a book like this, it is appropriate to pay a homage to the idea of the Living Earth (Gaia). For however small this chapter ends up being, doesn’t matter as much as showing respect to this important area. You see, it should have become clear by now, at this point in the book, that Earth is, indeed, one single living system, which regulates the chemistry and conditions of Earth’s surface in an “automatic” manner – as all living systems do.

This goes on to say that whatever happens in one part of the world is connected to what happens in another, sometimes imperceptibly, but nonetheless related to the whole. So when a butterfly takes off in the depths of the Amazon, its influence on the wind patterns of the world may be minute, almost beyond imagination, but it is making a contribution to homeostasis; the same is true of humans, of course, and our impact on the environment can be much more noticeable.

Sadly, in our hubris, we have forgotten that the Earth is our home, and even our mother – as most tribal cultures consider Earth to be. As such, we should show our mother (Gaia) gratitude, respect, and honor for her gift of life. Gaia is a very old name for Mother Earth, or Mother Nature. The mythical Gaia was the primal Greek goddess personifying the Earth, the Greek version of “Mother Nature,” or the Earth Mother. In Greek mythology, she birthed many of the major gods who ruled over different sections of the Earth.

Gaia is known as the nurturer, sustainer and giver of love to all who come to the goddess for support. She is known as the spirit of the Earth, plants, rocks and water. In the 1970’s James Lovelock reintroduced the Earth-mother concept through the medium of Ecology. He proposed that all living things are interrelated within the self-regulating systems of the Earth, which provides the optimal conditions to support life itself.

The modern approach to the idea that the Earth is a Living Being is called the Gaia theory. It explains that the Earth is a living system; that the Earth functions as a self-regulating system; that living and non-living parts of the Earth form a complex interacting system that can be thought of as a single organism. It proposes that organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth – to form a synergistic self-regulating complex system that helps to maintain and perpetuate the conditions for life on Earth.

The idea of the Earth as an integrated whole – a Living Being, has a long tradition. Gaia hypothesis is the first comprehensive scientific expression of this profoundly ancient belief, which has been widely accepted by many scientists since the 1970’s – most notably, the acceptance comes from those who have the understanding that comes from another closely related area known as systems thinking. The most exciting part of systems thinking is applying the current achievements of system theory to Gaia theory (the living Earth theory).

Formulated by British atmospheric scientist James Lovelock, and American microbiologist Lynn Margulis – Gaia hypothesis states that the Earth’s climate and surface environment are controlled by the plants, animals, and micro-organisms that inhabit it. That taken as a whole, the Earth behaves not as an inanimate sphere of rock and soil, sustained by the automatic and accidental processes of geology, as traditional earth science has long maintained, but more as a biological superorganism – a planetary body that adjusts and regulates itself.

Fundamentally, the Gaia hypothesis finds the Earth to be more like a life form than an inanimate object adjusting to internal and external changes much as an organism might react to threats and opportunities in the environment. Lovelock likes to compare the Earth to a tree.

Lynn Marguilis, on the other hand, believes that micro-organisms and their constituent parts are as fundamental to life as atoms and subatomic particles are to matter and energy; meaning that bacteria – single-celled organisms without nucleus (the earliest life forms from which all other earthly organisms have evolved) are the building blocks of life.

Another closely connected area is something called Deep Ecology, which can be seen as a network of phenomena that are fundamentally interconnected and interdependent. Deep ecology is a philosophical school of thought – founded by the Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess in the early seventies.

Deep ecology does not separate humans, or anything else from the natural environment – it does see the world not as a collection of isolated objects, but as a network of phenomena that are fundamentally interconnected and interdependent. Deep ecology recognizes the intrinsic value of all living beings, and views humans as just one particular strand in the larger web of life.

Deep ecological awareness recognizes the fundamental interdependence of all phenomena, and that we are all embedded in the cyclical processes of nature; ultimately, deep ecological awareness is spiritual awareness, which goes on to say that when the concept of the Human Spirit is understood as the mode of consciousness, in which the individual feels a sense of belonging, of connectedness to the Cosmos as a whole – it becomes clear that ecological awareness is spiritual in its deepest essence, you see?

___
~ ॐ ~ Sambodhi Padmasamadhi ~ ∞ ~

Get the Book: Awaken the Living Awareness Within – Discover the Keys to Happiness, Inner Peace & Harmony

[ Click » here « to read the next part: Metaphysical Paradigm Shift 1/3 ]

Extra Material: Video: You're It - Alan Watts. Video description: "An inspiring and profound speech from the late Alan Watts. Speech extract from 'Zen Bones and Tales' by Alan Watts"